Pages

Why Karolina Goswami love India

Karolina Goswami

About Karolina Goswami in her words.
"My name is Karolina Goswami. I am not an Indian. I am not biased. I am a typical European girl who never even tried Indian food a few years ago. Earlier in my life, I had never even dreamt of visiting India, but life is full of surprises. I fell in love with an Indian man who never wanted to live outside his country. So I visited India for the first time in 2014. It was not love at the first sight but every day I was discovering Indian reality that I have never been aware of and slowly I started to enjoy life in this country which is full-of-contrast. India has changed me and exposed me to a totally out of the ordinary world. The world where everything began.
I needed months to understand this country and feel here like I am at home. But I was not alone there. My husband was always there for me when I needed more information and I was curious about so many unusual (for me) things. After spending a few months there I realized that people in Europe are not aware of the beauty of this country and most of them were biased because of media. All the time I was facing one question: “Do you feel safe in India? Men are rapists there and for sure you, as a white skin blond hair girl, are much more in danger.” People fail to understand that in a country which is like a continent itself any kind of event can happen. What was more shocking to me is that so many people were criticizing this country even though they have never visited it. The streets were dirty and unsafe, people unfriendly… information that they were giving were trumped up and were not based on facts and proper research. That is why I decided to dig really deep and get to know the real truth about this country and this is exactly what my blog is all about.
I am not biased. I want to give you the truth about the place that I live in, about the place that my future children will call their motherland. I will not praise India. This is not a paradise. I will give the information that you need to understand this country, this society, these people. I will tell you why we all should thank India for what they gave us. I will explain to you why we have so many things in common with today’s India. There are many things that I don’t like about India and trust me I will share this with you. But remember my posts will always be based on facts, information and data.
In my life I have never been just a believer. I am a seeker and this attribute of mine remained the same even when I left my home country to discover the world. In my quest for truth-seeking, I learned and gained knowledge during my amazing experiences. And all I can say is, a person who is interested in only the truth or in other words a real truth-seeker will always find ways to access it. And I have always been able to find my ways.
-Karolina Goswami
(indiaindetails@gmail.com)
I am a Polish girl who comes from the Southeast part of Poland. I have traveled a lot around Europe in my life. India was the first country that I visited in Asia. I came to India around 2 years ago with my fiancée who later became my husband. He is an Indian national who is a furniture designer and his name is Anurag Goswami."

11 comments:

  1. One of the many glaring untruths which Polish intellectual Karolina Goswami has been peddling in the mass media after embedding herself in a Brahmo family, is her unsubstantiated charge that Russia had been undermining the "sovereignty" of India in the garb of co-operation for developing India's economic sector. Now, this is something so outlandish that such an allegation has never been made by any Indian government official thus far, if anything, India has been able to preserve its sovereignty till date owing in substantial part to its defence pact with Russia, which had stood behind India like a solid rock even in the face of imminent nuclear holocaust at the hands of the USA during Indo Portuguese war for liberation of Portuguese held colonies in the 1960's, and later in 1971 when the Ziofascist American supremo Henry Kissinger had deputed a formidable armada to the Bay of Bengal for wreaking nuclear genocide on India. Russia signed a pact with India for building nuclear reactors in India under India's strict nuclear liability laws, in contradistinction to the United States which tried to force a bilateral treaty on India which absolves American corporations who might build nuclear reactors in India of substantial liability by circumventing due process of law and overriding Indian domestic laws, and instead deprives Indian populace affected by a potential nuclear accident such as Fukushima tragedy, of even the right to seek redressal through court.

    As for Karolina's charge that Russia has been a supporter of Khalistan movement, one needs to first bear in mind that the closest any politician in India has ventured anywhere close to levelling a charge of subversion of Indian sovereignty upon Russia, Subrahmaniam Swamy, too has suggested in his same statement that Russia was not on the side of Khalistani militant terrorists, but was strongly on the side of India's unity and integrity so much so that it had nudged and goaded an otherwise reluctant Indian dispensation to take decisive military action for crushing the Khalistani terrorists who had been weaponising genocide on Indian populace as a means for political vivisection of India. It is indeed true that Russia had provided satellite data info to the Indian policy makers to impress the urgency of decisive coercive action upon them, as a tip off on the existence of a VHF transmitter in possession of Khalistani terrorists who had taken illicit sanctuary in the Golden temple, and it was vide that means that these fugitives from law had been in touch with their handlers residing abroad who had been instructing them for commiting murders and extortion in northern India. Chanan Singh Sidhu has detailed about the abduction, rape and murder of newly married girls come to pay obeissance at the temple, by gun-wielding terrorists occupying the inner precincts, and the eventual exhumation of bodies of 13 young girls by authorities. https://youtu.be/3Z4B2_pcOlo?si=odKGk5ynL5B4Ynsf
    Karolina Goswami makes intrusive admonishments to Indians who harbour soft feelings for Russia by saying "innocent" Indians who address Russia as "Mother Russia" ought to reserve that honourific solely for India which is their "only mother"; but Karolina fails to appreciate that this is not such a big deal as should warrant such a fuss on her part, in the same way in which the conventional addressal of co-ethnicist foreign national John Paul as "Father" by her Polish compatriots does not contravene their patriotic obligations towards their native Poland.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Karolina tries to rehabilitate the caste system in new camouflaged avatars by forwarding ingenius explanations as an apologist, but seems to have missed the point that the Veda too rejects caste system in its myriad manifestations in entirety. Karolina's understanding of Veda is encumbered by cultural alienation from Vedic Sanskrit which is markedly different from classical Sanskrit in semantics, and is colored by the ideological prejudices of her in-laws.

    Karolina has drawn on the collective west's psycho-ops warfare experience, in her efforts to mesmerise Indians by indulging in jingoistic talk which she believes would sound sweet to their ears, even to the extent of pretentious derision and berating of her own European culture, in the hope that she will thereby be able to win over their blind unguarded trust which she can craftily deploy for subsequently indoctrinating them with virulent hatred for Russia. Karolina's soliciting of generous monetary donations from Indians could be a smart strategy for not having to rely on funding from Europe, and being able to fend off potential criticism from whistleblowers on account of foreign influence, conflict of interest and rectitudinal compromise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Karolina Goswami has shown herself to be an exponent of the European version of Taqqiyya, who is drawing on the collective west’s psycho-ops warfare experience, in her capacity as the mascot for western global hegemony and propaganda, for trying to mesmerise Hindus of India by indulging in jingoistic talk which she believes would sound sweet to their ears, even to the extent of pretentious derision and berating of her own European culture, in the hope that she will thereby be able to win over their blind unguarded trust which she can craftily deploy for subsequently indoctrinating them with virulent hatred for Russia. Karolina expounds at length on elaborate thesis purporting to demonstrate how the collective west, which she brands as a cartel of “criminal Christian countries” is so very intolerantly unfavourably disposed towards India and the Indian civilisation, but soon afterwards, Karolina follows up on that thesis with her propaganda stipulating that Russia is not just an integral part but the ringleader of what she calls the “anti-Hindu, anti-India criminal Christian cabal”, and also that on the other hand the real ringleaders of global EU hegemony are actually the ones who are India’s most trustworthy friends and its natural allies against cultural onslought from “criminal Christian Russia”. Karolina intends to suceed where Antonio Maino had failed, on the same turf.
    I am reminded of a ship stationed by western countries off the Pacific coast of Vietnam during the Vietnam war, which broadcast sermons to the local populace exhorting them to eschew indigenous belief systems and supplant them by switch allegiance to the westeen bloc, but such political sermons were interspersed by advice on how to quit smoking and education about the ills of smoking. In this way, European propagandists feign an aura of altruism for winning over the confidence of target audience and stupefying the latters’ mental defence of scepticism which would otherwise have acted as a bulwark against indoctrinability, thereby rendering them susceptible to subsequent unsuspecting brainwashability to their own detriment.Karolina Goswami has been waging an acrimonius Media War of disinformation on Hindu India, on behalf of EU neo-colonialism. Her style of propaganda, which is an exercise in concerted consonance with quasi-imperialist Zio-oligarchic corporate entities affiliated with the western deep state, presupposes that India is a nation of gullible retards whom she can goad in any direction like dumb driven cattle. Karolina has scant respect if any, for the opinions, feelings and intellect of Hindu Indians. She does not respect Indian's right to freedom of beliefs and of access to balanced information. Whilst peddling a maliciously toxic and patently false anti-Russia narrative on her social media pages bolstered by outright lies spewn in one-sided comments posted by Karolina's cyberwarfare supporters, self-avowed Polish compatriots and bots, Karolina has literally immediately deleted or buried(shadow banned) hundreds of rejoinder comments which featured verifiable information debunking the lies peddled by her. Karolina's cyberwarfare accomplices have been indulging in blanket vilification of all such Indians who differ from her views, hurling the choicest of inane vituperation on the latter and branding them as "useful idiots" , "emotional fools" and "simps" "womanisers who lust after white Russian women". However, refusing to be contented with simply blacking or shutting out all sensible counter-narrative rejoinders in the comments section, Karolina on the other hand is so very intolerant towards persons who do not concur with her propaganda, true to the arrogance of European neocolonial spirit which she epitomises, that she is calling upon the liberal-globalist regime in her native Poland to persecute conscientious journalists who have expressed opionions or published info which are in dissonance with the fake narratives espoused by her !

    ReplyDelete
  4. Karolina is quoting piecemeal news selectively from some News channels operating inside Russia, for stereotyping the entire Russian nation as an enemy of India. Karolina has selectively quoted some India-critic articles from media outlets in Russia, and wrongly conflated them with Russian society at large, for citing them as proof of her conjecture that anti-India sentiments have been the normal paradigm in Russian social discourse.
    Karolina has tried to make India a proxy battleground for Poland's acrimonious war of narratives and civilisational aggression against Russia. By citing some anecdotal articles in RT channel, or some unflattering remarks about Yoga by a lone Russian national and insinuating that they form evidences of rampant and ingrained anti-India sentiment in Russian society, Karolina has viciously tried to evoke Hard-feelings towards Russians in hearts of Indians. But Indians are not such touchy volatile impressionables who would get provoked to vengeance by such cheap manipulative antics.
    She has made out even acts of benefaction towards India by Russia, as some sort of selfish and ignoble "sins", much like the Portuguese colonialists who averred that any nation aiding heathen India in any way is satanic. Karolina has bluntly insinuated that whenever Russia has aided or co-operated with India, it has done so not out of any goodwill, but solely from selfish design of drawing India into its orbit and subverting Indian polity for undermining India's sovereignty. Karolina impersonates India as if she is its authorized spokeswoman. However, careful scrutiny shows that Karolina is actually describing her own Euro-chauvinist character. It is she who as a Catho-chauvinist, has feigned Hinduistic pretentions for mesmerizing Indians and hijacking public opinion in subservience to European hegemony. Her fans say Indians are emotional fools who simp before Russia, but it is Karolina who wants Indians to propitate her like a Greek goddess and abide by her anti-Russia agenda in blind faith. In trying to pit Hindus against Russia, she has betrayed a paradox. She wants Indians to fully embrace her as their own without compunctions, but in her next move she weaponises that assimiliative bonhomie for cajoling Indians to hate fellow-beings namely Russians, on the verge of her friendship. India does not crave Karolina's affection at the cost of brotherly relations with other fellow humans. She reckons Indians as prey meant to be targetted, and not as her own compatriots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Karolina has even remonstarted against the propriety of certain Russian media houses placing public-awareness advertisements on buses and billboards across India offering support against the collective west's hegemonic assaults on Indian sovereignty, and Karolina's fan bots have gone so far as to taunt Indians for "tolerating" such a "pretentious show of solidarity" by Russia. Her fans brand such billboards as proof of Russia’s “ominous sabotage of Indian sovereignty and implanting of communist infiltration deep in all nooks and corners of India”. Evidently, Karolina’s contemptuous assessment of Indians deems them incapable of putting up any resistance to western imperialism within an indigenous ideological framework, save that of “communism” imported from Europe. That is why Karolina perceives all instances of Indians resisting western hegemony as examples of communist subversion of Indian polity. Karolina has taken liberal license to outrage and trivialise the राष्ट्रीय अस्मिता or national self-respect of India. Going by Karolina's own skewed logic which denies Russia the right to dare to co-operate or offer solidarity with India to fend off external threats to its sovereignty just because Karolina says Russian sincerity is drawn into question from Karolina's half baked allegations of precedents of Russian hostility in the past, one must wonder if a Pole like Karolina should even have the cheek to try to coerce Indians to get drawn on her side, Poland's side in its civilisational war on Russia?
    Going by Karolina's own logic as she has tried to apply in respect of Russia, after what Poles have done to Indians during Polish participation in the world's most dastardly holocaust, the Inquisition as wreaked in Gujarat and Goa, does it behove the Pole Karolina to cajole or even expect Indians to get lured to Poland's side in its acrimonious war of narratives and potential aggression against Russia!

    ReplyDelete
  6. The crux of Karolina Goswami's misleading thesis attributing nefarious motives to Russian co-operation with India, hinges on so called testimony of a Russian dissident named Yuri Bezmenov who had defected to the USA after a stint of posting in India. The unreliability or lack of veracity in his concocted accusations about civilisational abhorence for India in the minds of Russian government planners, can be gauged from the fact that in his memoirs, he has branded the India-backed 1971-era freedom fighters of Bangladesh, as " evil elitist conspiratorial syndicate aimed at destabilisation of East Pakistan". Yuri Bezmenov says that Russian support for the India-backed outbreak of revolution in East Pakistan was the last straw which revolted his sensibilities so much that he formally disowned Russia. In other words Yuri Bezmenov is making a candid admission from the horse's mouth that he was on the same page as the CIA which was India's adversary in 1971,and that he is so ideologically aligned with the East Pakistani regime notorious for holocaust of Bengali Hindus, that he formally parted ways with Russia only because Russia was opposed to that holocaustic Pakistani regime! So much so for the pretentious sympathies towards India and its Hindu majority cultural ethos which he feigns while accusing Russia of subversive and imperialist ambitions in India.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Karolina's tussle with somebody named Dhruv Rathi who airs views counter to the majoritarian consensus in India, has furnished her an opportunity which she is fully availing for piggyback riding on a wave of evoked sympathy out of perceived cultural camarederie, and then leveraging such sympathy for rendering the masses impressionable and vulnerable to suggestion, and then hijacking the sentiments of the masses in a different direction for poisoning their minds irrationally against all fellow Indians who refuse to ostracise or alienate Russia, or to maintain friendship with Russia. Karolina's feud with Dhruv Rathi is a subject of law and order, and it is no proof of Karolina's loyalty to India. It could well be a "manufactured" charade enacted by both parties in cahoots.
    The public at large is not a party to her tussle with Dhruv Rathi or anybody, and let the law take its course in such matters, and the emotionally manipulative appeals made by Karolina addressing Indian public to save her from Dhruv Rathi make no sense. Protection is the job of law enforcement, and the public is not obliged to jump in the fray of Karolina's squabbles and intrigues. For all we know, she and Dhruv might well be in this together and taking India for a ride. Karolina is weaponsing her real or pretentious tussle with Dhruv Rathi for evincing sympathy from impressionable sections of Indians, and then transmogrifying and redeploying that unguarded naive trust for recruiting the latter as zombies in the acrimonious war of fake narratives waged by Karolina's principals against Russia.
    Karolina is a Pole, she is from Poland which is a European country in the EU. Both France and Germany, countries in which Karolina has alleged assaults by Dhruv Rathi fans to have taken place, are big wigs in the EU, because they are the principal contributors to EU GDP and funding. Since the Polish government has very close relations with both France and Germany in the EU as well as NATO, it is best suited for pursuing Karolina's complaints and escalating them with appropriate authorities. The right place for Karolina to fight her case of alleged assaults in France and Germany is to lobby with her own Polish government for canvassing on her behalf with law enforcement authorities inside France and Germany. Technically, France, Geramy and Poland are parts of the same political entity or country, the EU; hence Karolina's complaint is an internal law and order affair of her own country. Karolina is an unofficial ambassador of extra-territorial projection of Poland's politicking influence in India and a front for European EU's neocolonial war of narratives against India who fakes Indic leanings as part of her covert intellectual saboteur agenda. She is more the responsibility of her Polish government more than of anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The preponderant narrative which emerges on one of Karolina's social media pages that Russia has always borne sinister hostile intentions towards India in garb of outward friendship, and had murdered Indian ex PM Shastri and nuclear scientist HJ Bhabha, and that Russian society is intrinsically inimical to India whereas Israelis are worthy of blind trust.
    several commentators have complained that Karolina has been immediately deleting their comments in which they have posted logical rejoinders to counter the vicious blanket vilification and demonisation by Karolina's supporters, of all such Indians who Harbour congenial or friendly feelings towards Russia. Karolina has gone overboard in her advocacy of the Crusaderic anti-India anti-Russia narrative emanating from the very same sources whom Karolina pretends to dislike and calls by the epithet "Criminal Christian countries". Karolina fans have poured vituperation on Indians at large and commented that Indians simp before Russia because they like to prostitute white Russian females, and commentators calling themselves Karolina's Polish compatriots are badmouthing Indians at large with choicest abuse for having soft feelings for Russia. Karolina has invited a flurry of hate comments against Indians from her supporters on her social media channel, while immediately deleting any rational rejoinders
    order to foist a toxic European war propaganda narrative on Indian viewers, with the motive of exerting influence on Indian public opinion on behalf of external forces inimical to India. Comments which could have cleared the air have been immediately deleted, and many more have been “buried”, which means they remain visible on the page only to the poster and to no one else! Karolina fans' insistence on demeaning Indians who harbour favorable opinions of Russia by branding them emotional fools and womanisers, but exhorting them to simp Israel nevertheless, fails to make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  9. While insinuating in her thumbnail that Christian Europeans and Muslim Arabs were savages before becoming civilised through access to Indian knowledge via cultural diffusion, which is one example of Karolina's strategy to sweeten up Hindus for entraining their sympathies for her covert agendas, Karolina Goswami attributes credit for rediscovery India's contributions to global civilisational  heritage, to a British Scotsman named William Dalrymple, eventhough the reality is that Dalrymple has simply sourced his info from candid acknowledgements made by in a bygone era by medieval Arab, Persian, Latino and Byzantine writers, mathematicians or historians, whose works have been translated into English by western scholars but the translated tomes have been sequestered from access to the overwhelming majority of world's populace by dint of recompilation and translation copyrights wielded by those western translators. As a result, those voluminous tomes have been gathering dust in American libraries. The collective west has tried its level best to keep India's contributions to global science and arts under wraps, through misuse of copyrights and IPR's.
    Eventhough Karolina might be trying to portray William Dalrymple as a doyen among Indophiles, a perusal of the license he has taken with casting  aspersions in disguise on Indian society do not show his intentions to be exactly flattering to the latter. Attention might be drawn in particular to what the trio of Vincent Smith, Dalrymple and Utpal Kumar have portrayed as the courtesan culture of India. Echoing statements of similar import made by his peer William Dalrymple, Vincent Smith has said that prior to the establiahment of British rule in India, it was customary for the gentry of Indian towns to send their children to brothels of courtesans or prostitutes for getting trained in sophosticated mannerisms and imbibing high society cultural etiquette, apart from learning the finesse of art of love-making. On exerting one's mind a little bit, it would seem that the message is that harlots are the architects of Indian culture or erudition . Moreover, Dalrymple's admirer Utpal Kumar has gone so far as to remark without any proof whatsoever, that modern day prostitutes in Indian brothels, whom he specifically mentions as being Bengali Muslims by extraction, deeply lament the fact that they have to put up with the revulsive compulsion of having to entertain patrons from among the working classes of India whom Utpal Kumar specifies as Hindi speaking rickshaw-puller labourers from the populous provinces of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, and that they deeply resent this predicament because of abhorence for the obnoxious stench of the latters' body odour. Such observations betray an attitude of crypto-racist contempt for Indians bordering on malice.
    Karolina suggests that Czarist Russia had intended to disenfranchise Hindu Indians by planning to "conquer" British India. But it is common knowledge in India that 12 prominent revolutionaries in Uttar Pradesh had drafted an appeal to Czar Alexander of Russia, and sent Rao Tula Ram as their emissary, seeking military help for ousting British erst from India. In Subsequent years, similar letters soliciting military aid against colonial British regime were sent to Russian court by princely rulers of Jaipur, Jodhpur and Bilaner, And these letters have survived to this day in original in foreign office archives of Russia. The so-called Russian push to the south as alleged by Karolina would have been analogous to the Mongol push into Afghanistan and Sindh in medieval times, for dislodging the yoke of far worse evils namely British colonists and genocidal Turk empire of Sultans Balban and Iltutmish respectively.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Karolina perceives (or so she seems to convey) all instances of Indians resisting western hegemony as examples of communist subversion of Indian polity. Karolina's simmering intolerance for anti-colonial narratives which run counter to the Eurohegemonic narratives which she covertly espouses, shows up with equal fervour amongst her ardent supporters as well. One of Karolina's fans, a lady named Ananya Das Mangelakar, who regularly contributes articles to a private online channel, writes in derogatory tone that social media accounts tied to mainstream news channels which are aligned with Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, have been pushing a narrative which attempts to paint Canadian PM Justin Trudeau in negative light regarding his stance on the Khalistan separatist movement, by claiming that such policies pursued by Trudeau (can potentially) harm bilateral ties between India and Canada. This Karolina-afficionado does not stop at that but goes on to add that such narratives pursued by media outlets affiliated with Indian PM Mr Modi, are (brazen) "attempts to create divisions within Canadian politics and society". In other words, Karolina fans are branding Indian protests against Canadian political interference in internal affairs of India and Canadian onslaughts against India's sovereignty, as tantamount to illcit Indian meddling in Canadian domestic affairs; these Karolina fans have made the legitimate Indian protests look like something which falls under the grey area of culpability under Canadian law. In fact, Karolina afficionado Ananya Das Mangelakar posted this Machiavellian observation, which seeks to arraign the victim for the crime of the perpetrator, on the very same day and just right beneath the place where she had posted a flattering ode to her icon Karolina.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Karolina Goswami makes intrusive admonishments to Indians who harbour soft feelings for Russia by saying "innocent" Indians who address Russia as "Mother Russia" ought to reserve that honourific solely for India which is their "only mother"; but Karolina fails to appreciate that this is not such a big deal as should warrant such a fuss on her part, in the same way in which the conventional addressal of co-ethnicist foreign national John Paul as "Father" by her Polish compatriots does not contravene their patriotic obligations towards their native Poland. When Karolina reprimands Indians saying that no other country save India is worthy of their reverance, she oversteps her legitimate brief by assuming right of monopolistic jurisdiction over Indians' sovereign prerogative of adoring any being or entity at their absolute discretion subject to the underpinnings of their ingrained Vedic ethos. It is noteworthy that Karolina has entered into matrimonial liason with an individual, a human being who incidentally happens to be an Indian. This is because of her own admission she has married her sweetheart out of considerations of love and her heart's calling instead of considerations of wealth, power, prestige, etc. As such, she has married an individual in her private pursuit of finding her true love, and she has in no way married the entire India nation or race or community. Accordingly, she cannot claim rights of shepherdship over the entire Indian community by dictating to Indians whom to venerate, worship or dislike in their individual and collective capacities. In the same way in which Karolina will not contenance someone reading too much into her own pronouncements viz. "I am not Indian. I am not biased. I am a typical European girl" and taking those statements to be an affrontery to India in the sense that Karolina is supposedly disowning or rejecting India, likewise it is insensible of Karolina to make unauthorised pontific insinuations suggesting that Indians adoring Russia in their hearts are in any way disloyal to India. Karolina's trivialisation and ridicule of such Indians by labelling them naive simpletons by innuendo, is totally unauthorised and unwarranted. Moreover, if Karolina's unwarranted admonishments are taken seriously, then she ought to remember that charity begins at home and there should be concord between practice and preaching. Applying Karolina's logic on herself in reverse, I would assume that since Poles must regard only Poland as their only country, they ought to disapprove of that country's amalgamation with the European Union and the attendant partial loss of sovereignty, and I would be inclined to presume that Karolina must be an advocate of Poland's secession from the EU to correct the wrongs of its merger with a host of other countries featuring different cultures, ethnic composition and heritage. It is unclear if authorities in Warsaw will take kindly to such a stance.

    ReplyDelete

Flags

Flag Counter